Instead of re-treading the same ground, then, after a very brief introduction to the key features, I'll leave you to dig back into Robin Bigwood's previous DP reviews: DP7, from March 2010 ( /sos/mar10/articles/dp7.htm) and DP6, from November 2008 ( /sos/nov08/articles/dp6.htm) would be the best places to start. Operation is almost identical on both platforms, and the bulk of the user-interface features in DP8 are retained from DP7. So, if you are a PC musician looking for a top-of-the-line DAW environment to work in, is DP8 for Windows worth considering alongside the obvious competition? This means that DP8 for Windows is, right from its first release, a heavyweight music production environment. The Mac OS version saw the light of day first, late in 2012 - but, true to their word, MOTU then released the Windows version in May this year and, bar some minor cosmetic differences, the feature sets on the two platforms are the same. Given that DP has been Mac-only since its first release, many were surprised when MOTU announced that DP8 would be available in a Windows version as well. And while its user base is perhaps not as large as the likes of Cubase, Logic or Pro Tools, DP is a well-featured system that is as capable as its peers of catering to every aspect of the music-production process. Throughout that history, DP has attracted a dedicated following, especially in the world of music for picture. It originated in the mid-'80s as a MIDI sequencing package for Apple computers called Performer, and has evolved through numerous iterations to the current incarnation: Digital Performer 8. Mark Of The Unicorn's Digital Performer has a long history. How worried should MOTU's competitors be? Nearly 30 years into its history, Mark Of The Unicorn's flagship recording DAW makes its first appearance as a Windows application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |